First:
"Ten members of the First Christian Church of Boulder congregation participated in the hobbyist focus group... Six of the group said they were more inclined to visit the museum...Three indicated that viewing a virtual visit probably would not affect the likelihood of their actually visiting the museum... One said that it would depend on the museum... One indicated being less inclined..."
Ok... 6+3+1+1 = 11. Who snuck into the focus group of ten? (Better yet, 10-6-3-1-1 = -1. Take that, physics.)
Next:
"Seven members of the Colorado Mountain Club participated in the General Users group... The participants were evenly divided about how a virtual visit to a museum would affect their inclination to visit in-person."
Seven evenly divided = 3.5. I want to know more about these two .5 people. Were they on the fence about the issue? Confused? Split personality? (I hate it when I argue with myself in public...)
While amusing, I'm really starting to question whether or not I can use this article in my paper and still retain my own credibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment